Feb 282010
 

At a time when anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is becoming broadly recognized as a politically driven, pseudo-scientific power-grab, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates recently “unvielded his vision” of global catastrophe unless net man-made carbon emissions are reduced to zero. The video of his peculiar, ill-timed, February TED2010 talk is here.

Gates also delivered a very odd comment at around the 4:30 mark of the linked video where he maintains “if we do a really great job on vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [his initial 2050 global population projection of 9-billion] by perhaps about 10 to 15 percent.”

Bill Gates recently pledged $10-billion towards a global vaccine program targeting the “world’s needy children.”

Gates’s comment is inconvenient at best because Third World vaccination programs have a well supported linkage with sterilization. In a widely cited and rigorously documented Philippines case, that country’s Supreme Court halted a WHO tetanus vaccination program after it had been shown that the inoculations, given only to young women of child-bearing age, were tainted with a hormone that renders “a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.” A Natural News article states:

In the 1990`s the UN`s World Health Organization launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of women in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines between the ages of 15 and 45. The stated purpose was to protect against Tetanus or Lockjaw, a painful sometimes lethal infectious reaction to external wounds or cuts. However, the vaccine was not given to men or boys, who are more prone to wounds from cuts and rusty nails than the ladies.

Noticing this anomaly, Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization became suspicious and had the vaccine samples tested. The tests revealed that the WHO Tetanus vaccine used to inoculate women of child bearing age contained human Chorionic Gonadotrophin or hCG, a natural hormone that is secreted in the initial stages of pregnancy, but when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier stimulated antibodies rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy. None of the women vaccinated were told.

In 1995, the Catholic Women`s League of the Philippines won a court order halting a UNICEF anti-tetanus program because the vaccine had been laced with B-hCG. The Supreme Court of the Philippines found the surreptitious sterilization program had already vaccinated three million women, aged 12 to 45. B-hCG-laced vaccine was also found in at least four other developing countries.

Apparently, this method of sterilization has been patented. An excerpt from that patent for a “birth control vaccine” follows:

Population is growing at a rapid pace in many economically developing countries and there is a continuing need of an alternate method for regulation of fertility. We proposed several years back a birth control vaccine which induces the formation of antibodies against the human pregnancy hormone, the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). These inventions are described in patents issued in India, U.S.A. and several other countries. (Ref. EP 204566, JP 62286928, CA 1239346, U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,312, CN 8603854). We describe now another invention which generates antibody response of a long duration against hCG after a single or a limited number of injections.

Similar claims were made in 2004 during a UNICEF sponsored Nigerian polio vaccine program.

  24 Responses to “Bill Gates: We can lower the world’s population with vaccines”

  1. I wonder if gates or any of his associates have make any comments about his plans on how to use the vaccines and lower the number of the population by 2050. He just mentioned it together with health care and something else.

  2. I can hardly believe I was studpid enough to think that Gates meant to have newer better vaccines to save lives..I also cannot imagine that information was mean’t for the population at large. My brain transposed it into thinking to save lives, I could not even berlieve it otherwise until I read the print. I listened to what he said probably 6 times. no reason to trust anyone who is doing anything with the government. Herre we have people who do not even want contraaceptives available, as it is killing an embryo. Come on get real, some of these people are the ones who think everyone should be shot up with vaccine. sharon

  3. the quote reffered to the use of vaccines to prevent frequent deaths in childhood which spurn attempts to have children even more so, due to the ever looming chance of an early fatality. because vaccines can lower such prospects, and allow children to reach aduthood, rather than attempting to wardoff a lack or heis and family through increased reproduction, familes will be able to be better assureed that one or two children that they do have will be able to lead productive lives. further mmore the premise for the ‘well documentede case’ provided has gaps in the reasoning of it as an intentional steralization device. it is far easier to steralize males than females through various means, which the article admits would have been easier to do given the lack of suspcion. furthermore women are less likely to be suspicius of vaccines, which accounted for the total lack of male vaccination patients in the country, they were not a target demographic. in addition, this seems at worst to be a product that had a serious flaw in it, given the lack of attention at hiding such a ploy. also the credibility of the article citing the time of the vaccination as the 1990′s often as similiar reference patterns to urban legends and unrefiable conspiracy theories. it is irresponsiable to try and link a comnnection between an obvious nod to the fact that population naturally goes down as quality of life goes up, as an attempt to create a government conspiracy to forcibly steralize individuals.

    • And that makes no sense at all Matt. How would preventing frequent deaths of children advance a cause of REDUCING population?

      • He actually did make it clear, and it is how it would work psychologically. Most probably a family that has over 5 kids has them because they fear the death of their children and want at least a few to survive. Now, of course they might ALL survive, but the risks are high and “one needs heirs” it’s an almost genetic need…While if you have a good healthcare, and people are more likely not to die as youth, you’d have people with a normal amount of 2-3 (max) kids that they will know would survive them. Also Gates refers to reproductive health services etc, I guess this also would include birth control and sexual education being spread to less developed countries, where they probably have as many kids as they happen to get and not settle for a controlled number using something as simple as a condomn or a pill. You think that would be easy to find in so called “3rd world” countries? The population boost would then be reduced to a healthy birth rate. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c5/Birth_rate_figures_for_countries.PNG this is what wiki says on birth rate. I can’t compare that to rate of death but probably if you crossreference them it would prove that less developed countries do have a great population boost. It does sound ilogical, but that’s the way it seems to work

        • Who gets to decide what a “normal” amount of children is? 2-3 is normal in YOUR mind but not everyone agrees with you. So you get to decide how many kids others have because of your own preconceived ideas? And the women were vaccinated with something in it w/o their knowledge. Birth control is a CHOICE and should never be forced on a society. No govt or agency should have a right to sterilize anyone without their consent. That is morally corrupt. BTW, wiki is not an authority on the subject.

    • Just in Case you get an email to notify you of replies:

      Mr. Jones, while your argument may seem logical on the surface it has some serious flaws. Lets start with your assertion that it was ‘an obvious nod to the fact that population goes down as qualify of life goes up’. The single biggest determining factor for a reduction in population growth / birth rates in any country anywhere on the globe is education because as a general rule, when women become literate and educational attainment rates rise, birth rates fall. That isn’t just a vague socio-economic statement that’s hard to grasp. That’s a real predicator of actual behavior – your wife’s and your daughter’s. The higher an education a woman has, the fewer the children the woman will have. That’s because women getting an education will put off getting married and having children until she’s finished with her education. Educated women learn about contraception and family planning, so they have less unwanted pregnancies. Even further still, education broadens their perspectives about what the world has to offer them besides being a wife and mother. Which is why there are a number of cultures around the world consciously preventing or discouraging women from being educated. It isn’t because they believe girls are incapable of learning. It’s the reverse: they fear what the girls could accomplish if they were educated. Educated women also learn about how to better care for the children they already have, they spend more time, not less, with their kids not to mention they stimulate and engage the children in ways that would never even occur to those without an education. This poses the question as to why someone who is as well informed as Mr. Gates failed to mention this fact and instead chose to put forward ‘health care’ and ‘reproductive health services’ as being bigger drives for lowering birth rates. Not to mention that the assertion that new vaccines will lead to a reduction in population seems inconsistent with the whole purpose of using a vaccine which strangely enough is to prevent death.

      With regard to the WHO activities in the Philippines you fail to take into account the actual overwhelming historical evidence that it was indeed an intentional sterilisation device. Not to mention that the administraiton of the vaccine was carried out by a UN related body which has been shown time and time again to be a polictically corrupted institution. One would have to be either quite stupid, nieve or very well indoctrinated to believe that this was simply a case of a product with a ’serious flaw’. The very fact that you have tried to muddy the waters by linking this to ‘urban legends’ and ‘unverifiable conspiracy theories’ leads me to believe that you are unfortunately the latter. The use of the vaccine in this manner is a verfiable fact not an ‘unverifiable conspiracy theory’. Next you will be trying to convince me that antroprogenic global warming is real and based on sound science or that Operation Enduring Freedom was about bringing democracy to Iraq and that America has no history of using false flag events. No doubt you would assert that these are also ‘conspiracy theories’.

      I know, I know. It all seems so ubelieveable and so much to take in but you have a choice to open your mind, question everything, to do your own research and thinking. Or you can just go back to sleep.

      As an aside the fact that the method has been patented speaks volumes, the only reason to patent is to gain legal ownership and thus allow one to maximise profit. Worryingly patenting implies that this vaccine is due to be used in a widespread manner. Or maybe your explanation is that some company decided it didn’t need tens of thousands so it decided to spend it on patenting random stuff on the off chance that it ‘might’ be used at some stage.

      • Operation Enduring Freedom was about overthrowing Saddam then stabilizing the country the best way we know how. e.g, The Marshal plan, MacArthur’s makeover of Japan. False flags? Is someone smoking the Northwoods papers again?

  4. Mr. Jones, while your argument may seem logical on the surface it has some serious flaws. Lets start with your assertion that it was ‘an obvious nod to the fact that population goes down as qualify of life goes up’. The single biggest determining factor for a reduction in population growth / birth rates in any country anywhere on the globe is education because as a general rule, when women become literate and educational attainment rates rise, birth rates fall. That isn’t just a vague socio-economic statement that’s hard to grasp. That’s a real predicator of actual behavior – your wife’s and your daughter’s. The higher an education a woman has, the fewer the children the woman will have. That’s because women getting an education will put off getting married and having children until she’s finished with her education. Educated women learn about contraception and family planning, so they have less unwanted pregnancies. Even further still, education broadens their perspectives about what the world has to offer them besides being a wife and mother. Which is why there are a number of cultures around the world consciously preventing or discouraging women from being educated. It isn’t because they believe girls are incapable of learning. It’s the reverse: they fear what the girls could accomplish if they were educated. Educated women also learn about how to better care for the children they already have, they spend more time, not less, with their kids not to mention they stimulate and engage the children in ways that would never even occur to those without an education. This poses the question as to why someone who is as well informed as Mr. Gates failed to mention this fact and instead chose to put forward ‘health care’ and ‘reproductive health services’ as being bigger drives for lowering birth rates. Not to mention that the assertion that new vaccines will lead to a reduction in population seems inconsistent with the whole purpose of using a vaccine which strangely enough is to prevent death.

    With regard to the WHO activities in the Philippines you fail to take into account the actual overwhelming historical evidence that it was indeed an intentional sterilisation device. Not to mention that the administraiton of the vaccine was carried out by a UN related body which has been shown time and time again to be a polictically corrupted institution. One would have to be either quite stupid, nieve or very well indoctrinated to believe that this was simply a case of a product with a ‘serious flaw’. The very fact that you have tried to muddy the waters by linking this to ‘urban legends’ and ‘unverifiable conspiracy theories’ leads me to believe that you are unfortunately the latter. The use of the vaccine in this manner is a verfiable fact not an ‘unverifiable conspiracy theory’. Next you will be trying to convince me that antroprogenic global warming is real and based on sound science or that Operation Enduring Freedom was about bringing democracy to Iraq and that America has no history of using false flag events. No doubt you would assert that these are also ‘conspiracy theories’.

    I know, I know. It all seems so ubelieveable and so much to take in but you have a choice to open your mind, question everything, to do your own research and thinking. Or you can just go back to sleep.

    As an aside the fact that the method has been patented speaks volumes, the only reason to patent is to gain legal ownership and thus allow one to maximise profit. Worryingly patenting implies that this vaccine is due to be used in a widespread manner. Or maybe your explanation is that some company decided it didn’t need tens of thousands so it decided to spend it on patenting random stuff on the off chance that it ‘might’ be used at some stage.

  5. [...] with reducing human population, and continue to call for the use of genetically engineered food and vaccines. I figure, in Extinctions, Over-Population and the Profit Paradigm, those who concentrated so [...]

  6. Did you know that in multiples of 3 through the alphabet these things equil this.

    BIRTH CONTROL PILLS = 666
    USING BIRTH CONTROL IS BAD = 777
    YEHOVAH LOVES YESHUWA = 777
    YEHOVAH IS YESHUWA’S GOD = 777
    YEHOVAH IS TRULY GREAT = 777
    YEHOVAH GOD IS VERY GREAT = 777
    CHRISTIAN RELIGION IS GOOD = 777
    YEHOVAH FIRST CREATION = 777
    BILL GATES THE THIRD IS A DEMON = 777
    NATIONAL FLAGS ARE IDOLATRY = 777
    IT’S TRUE THE BEARDS ARE GOOD = 777

    There are many more results I have that I will not post here. A=3 B=6 C=9 D=12 E=15 F=18 and so on all the way to Z in multiples of 3.

    Verify these results quick in the alphanumeric calculators at http://www.666myth.com

    YEHOVAH = 777 in Starter 100
    HITLER = 666 in Starter 100

    A=100 B=101 C=102 D=103 E=104 F=105 and so on all the way to Z

  7. Sorry I meant:

    YESHUWA FIRST CREATION = 777 in multiples of 3

  8. thanks moser you freaking shill.

  9. All you are speculating , but look at the hard evidence there are PATENTS , so they do exist , you can’t argue that , why woould there be a patent if such a thing does not exist , wake up , stop being in denial , psychopaths run the world

  10. [...] Vaccinations – as a form of birth control – Bill Gates [...]

  11. I am sorry to say, but aren’t you getting a little paranoid here? Sure, Bill states that vaccines will result in population decrease. But it is YOU that just assumes he means to say that vaccines will actually KILL people. Why would anyone make such a ridiculous statement? If Bill is one of the “bad guys” here, why would he publicly blow his cover like this? It doesn’t make any sense.

    Until you realize that Bill is refering to studies that show that show that when overall health conditions are improved, people tend to produce less offspring. Probably because they know less of them will die from all sorts of diseases. And since these vaccines help prevent disease, the net result over time will be: lesser people. This is what Bill is reffering to. Not some diabollical scheme to just kill off 90% of the people by poisened vaccines or something.

    Of course you could argue that vaccines are not actually helping people at all and in some cases are the cause of death and disease. But that would be an entire different discussion.

    • In fact, the article doesn’t make any assumptions as to Gates’ “true” intentions as you are extensively doing, but discusses the unfortunate possibility that he could have meant exactly what he said. The article accurately quotes him, and then discusses a shocking vaccination program that has been shown in a court of law to directly reduce human populations.

    • Peter, PLEASE re-read your statement(sorry van I will not hold it against you if you don’t post this-I have to remove myself from this site anyway) 1. “Bill” would totally “blow his cover” because it’s no fun if the adversary doesn’t ASK for it .2. They are doing this under our noses for a reason. Labeling all intelligent information “paranoia” is just being lazy. And go Romney. lol

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>