<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Gates: We can lower the world&#8217;s population with vaccines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/</link>
	<description>Ongoing expert analysis of computing, high technology and world events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:42:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>All you are speculating , but look at the hard evidence there are PATENTS , so they do exist , you can&#039;t argue that , why woould there be a patent if such a thing does not exist , wake up , stop being in denial , psychopaths run the world</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you are speculating , but look at the hard evidence there are PATENTS , so they do exist , you can&#8217;t argue that , why woould there be a patent if such a thing does not exist , wake up , stop being in denial , psychopaths run the world</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gates și vaccinurile&#8230; &#171; Ender&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gates și vaccinurile&#8230; &#171; Ender&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>[...] http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/" rel="nofollow">http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>thanks moser you &lt;strong&gt;freaking&lt;/strong&gt; shill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks moser you <strong>freaking</strong> shill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sp1ke0kill3r</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>Sp1ke0kill3r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-613</guid>
		<description>Operation Enduring Freedom was about overthrowing Saddam then stabilizing the country the best way we know how. e.g, The Marshal plan, MacArthur&#039;s  makeover of Japan. False flags? Is someone smoking the Northwoods papers again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Operation Enduring Freedom was about overthrowing Saddam then stabilizing the country the best way we know how. e.g, The Marshal plan, MacArthur&#8217;s  makeover of Japan. False flags? Is someone smoking the Northwoods papers again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Antoine Moser</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Antoine Moser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-570</guid>
		<description>Sorry I meant:

YESHUWA FIRST CREATION = 777 in multiples of 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I meant:</p>
<p>YESHUWA FIRST CREATION = 777 in multiples of 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Antoine Moser</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Antoine Moser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Did you know that in multiples of 3 through the alphabet these things equil this.

BIRTH CONTROL PILLS = 666
USING BIRTH CONTROL IS BAD = 777
YEHOVAH LOVES YESHUWA = 777
YEHOVAH IS YESHUWA&#039;S GOD = 777
YEHOVAH IS TRULY GREAT = 777
YEHOVAH GOD IS VERY GREAT = 777
CHRISTIAN RELIGION IS GOOD = 777
YEHOVAH FIRST CREATION = 777
BILL GATES THE THIRD IS A DEMON = 777
NATIONAL FLAGS ARE IDOLATRY = 777
IT&#039;S TRUE THE BEARDS ARE GOOD = 777

There are many more results I have that I will not post here. A=3 B=6 C=9 D=12 E=15 F=18 and so on all the way to Z in multiples of 3.

Verify these results quick in the alphanumeric calculators at www.666myth.com

YEHOVAH = 777 in Starter 100
HITLER = 666 in Starter 100

A=100 B=101 C=102 D=103 E=104 F=105 and so on all the way to Z</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that in multiples of 3 through the alphabet these things equil this.</p>
<p>BIRTH CONTROL PILLS = 666<br />
USING BIRTH CONTROL IS BAD = 777<br />
YEHOVAH LOVES YESHUWA = 777<br />
YEHOVAH IS YESHUWA&#8217;S GOD = 777<br />
YEHOVAH IS TRULY GREAT = 777<br />
YEHOVAH GOD IS VERY GREAT = 777<br />
CHRISTIAN RELIGION IS GOOD = 777<br />
YEHOVAH FIRST CREATION = 777<br />
BILL GATES THE THIRD IS A DEMON = 777<br />
NATIONAL FLAGS ARE IDOLATRY = 777<br />
IT&#8217;S TRUE THE BEARDS ARE GOOD = 777</p>
<p>There are many more results I have that I will not post here. A=3 B=6 C=9 D=12 E=15 F=18 and so on all the way to Z in multiples of 3.</p>
<p>Verify these results quick in the alphanumeric calculators at <a href="http://www.666myth.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.666myth.com</a></p>
<p>YEHOVAH = 777 in Starter 100<br />
HITLER = 666 in Starter 100</p>
<p>A=100 B=101 C=102 D=103 E=104 F=105 and so on all the way to Z</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amadeo</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>Amadeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 15:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-464</guid>
		<description>PS you could read a bit about that here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic-economic_paradox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS you could read a bit about that here <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic-economic_paradox" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic-economic_paradox</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amadeo</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Amadeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 15:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-463</guid>
		<description>He actually did make it clear, and it is how it would work psychologically. Most probably a family that has over 5 kids has them because they fear the death of their children and want at least a few to survive. Now, of course they might ALL survive, but the risks are high and &quot;one needs heirs&quot; it&#039;s an almost genetic need...While if you have a good healthcare, and people are more likely not to die as youth, you&#039;d have people with a normal amount of 2-3 (max) kids that they will know would survive them. Also Gates refers to reproductive health services etc, I guess this also would include birth control and sexual education being spread to less developed countries, where they probably have as many kids as they happen to get and not settle for a controlled number using something as simple as a condomn or a pill. You think that would be easy to find in so called &quot;3rd world&quot; countries? The population boost would then be reduced to a healthy birth rate. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c5/Birth_rate_figures_for_countries.PNG this is what wiki says on birth rate. I can&#039;t compare that to rate of death but probably if you crossreference them it would prove that less developed countries do have a great population boost. It does sound ilogical, but that&#039;s the way it seems to work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He actually did make it clear, and it is how it would work psychologically. Most probably a family that has over 5 kids has them because they fear the death of their children and want at least a few to survive. Now, of course they might ALL survive, but the risks are high and &#8220;one needs heirs&#8221; it&#8217;s an almost genetic need&#8230;While if you have a good healthcare, and people are more likely not to die as youth, you&#8217;d have people with a normal amount of 2-3 (max) kids that they will know would survive them. Also Gates refers to reproductive health services etc, I guess this also would include birth control and sexual education being spread to less developed countries, where they probably have as many kids as they happen to get and not settle for a controlled number using something as simple as a condomn or a pill. You think that would be easy to find in so called &#8220;3rd world&#8221; countries? The population boost would then be reduced to a healthy birth rate. <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c5/Birth_rate_figures_for_countries.PNG" rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c5/Birth_rate_figures_for_countries.PNG</a> this is what wiki says on birth rate. I can&#8217;t compare that to rate of death but probably if you crossreference them it would prove that less developed countries do have a great population boost. It does sound ilogical, but that&#8217;s the way it seems to work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: well that's different</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>well that's different</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-377</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutch Gov jabbed 2/3 with H1N1; wants GSK &#38; Novartis to buy unused vaccines &#171; COTO Report</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Dutch Gov jabbed 2/3 with H1N1; wants GSK &#38; Novartis to buy unused vaccines &#171; COTO Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-136</guid>
		<description>[...] with reducing human population, and continue to call for the use of genetically engineered food and vaccines. I figure, in Extinctions, Over-Population and the Profit Paradigm, those who concentrated so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with reducing human population, and continue to call for the use of genetically engineered food and vaccines. I figure, in Extinctions, Over-Population and the Profit Paradigm, those who concentrated so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Just in Case you get an email to notify you of replies:

Mr. Jones, while your argument may seem logical on the surface it has some serious flaws. Lets start with your assertion that it was ‘an obvious nod to the fact that population goes down as qualify of life goes up’. The single biggest determining factor for a reduction in population growth / birth rates in any country anywhere on the globe is education because as a general rule, when women become literate and educational attainment rates rise, birth rates fall. That isn’t just a vague socio-economic statement that’s hard to grasp. That’s a real predicator of actual behavior – your wife’s and your daughter’s. The higher an education a woman has, the fewer the children the woman will have. That’s because women getting an education will put off getting married and having children until she’s finished with her education. Educated women learn about contraception and family planning, so they have less unwanted pregnancies. Even further still, education broadens their perspectives about what the world has to offer them besides being a wife and mother. Which is why there are a number of cultures around the world consciously preventing or discouraging women from being educated. It isn’t because they believe girls are incapable of learning. It’s the reverse: they fear what the girls could accomplish if they were educated. Educated women also learn about how to better care for the children they already have, they spend more time, not less, with their kids not to mention they stimulate and engage the children in ways that would never even occur to those without an education. This poses the question as to why someone who is as well informed as Mr. Gates failed to mention this fact and instead chose to put forward ‘health care’ and ‘reproductive health services’ as being bigger drives for lowering birth rates. Not to mention that the assertion that new vaccines will lead to a reduction in population seems inconsistent with the whole purpose of using a vaccine which strangely enough is to prevent death.

With regard to the WHO activities in the Philippines you fail to take into account the actual overwhelming historical evidence that it was indeed an intentional sterilisation device. Not to mention that the administraiton of the vaccine was carried out by a UN related body which has been shown time and time again to be a polictically corrupted institution. One would have to be either quite stupid, nieve or very well indoctrinated to believe that this was simply a case of a product with a ’serious flaw’. The very fact that you have tried to muddy the waters by linking this to ‘urban legends’ and ‘unverifiable conspiracy theories’ leads me to believe that you are unfortunately the latter. The use of the vaccine in this manner is a verfiable fact not an ‘unverifiable conspiracy theory’. Next you will be trying to convince me that antroprogenic global warming is real and based on sound science or that Operation Enduring Freedom was about bringing democracy to Iraq and that America has no history of using false flag events. No doubt you would assert that these are also ‘conspiracy theories’.

I know, I know. It all seems so ubelieveable and so much to take in but you have a choice to open your mind, question everything, to do your own research and thinking. Or you can just go back to sleep.

As an aside the fact that the method has been patented speaks volumes, the only reason to patent is to gain legal ownership and thus allow one to maximise profit. Worryingly patenting implies that this vaccine is due to be used in a widespread manner. Or maybe your explanation is that some company decided it didn’t need tens of thousands so it decided to spend it on patenting random stuff on the off chance that it ‘might’ be used at some stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in Case you get an email to notify you of replies:</p>
<p>Mr. Jones, while your argument may seem logical on the surface it has some serious flaws. Lets start with your assertion that it was ‘an obvious nod to the fact that population goes down as qualify of life goes up’. The single biggest determining factor for a reduction in population growth / birth rates in any country anywhere on the globe is education because as a general rule, when women become literate and educational attainment rates rise, birth rates fall. That isn’t just a vague socio-economic statement that’s hard to grasp. That’s a real predicator of actual behavior – your wife’s and your daughter’s. The higher an education a woman has, the fewer the children the woman will have. That’s because women getting an education will put off getting married and having children until she’s finished with her education. Educated women learn about contraception and family planning, so they have less unwanted pregnancies. Even further still, education broadens their perspectives about what the world has to offer them besides being a wife and mother. Which is why there are a number of cultures around the world consciously preventing or discouraging women from being educated. It isn’t because they believe girls are incapable of learning. It’s the reverse: they fear what the girls could accomplish if they were educated. Educated women also learn about how to better care for the children they already have, they spend more time, not less, with their kids not to mention they stimulate and engage the children in ways that would never even occur to those without an education. This poses the question as to why someone who is as well informed as Mr. Gates failed to mention this fact and instead chose to put forward ‘health care’ and ‘reproductive health services’ as being bigger drives for lowering birth rates. Not to mention that the assertion that new vaccines will lead to a reduction in population seems inconsistent with the whole purpose of using a vaccine which strangely enough is to prevent death.</p>
<p>With regard to the WHO activities in the Philippines you fail to take into account the actual overwhelming historical evidence that it was indeed an intentional sterilisation device. Not to mention that the administraiton of the vaccine was carried out by a UN related body which has been shown time and time again to be a polictically corrupted institution. One would have to be either quite stupid, nieve or very well indoctrinated to believe that this was simply a case of a product with a ’serious flaw’. The very fact that you have tried to muddy the waters by linking this to ‘urban legends’ and ‘unverifiable conspiracy theories’ leads me to believe that you are unfortunately the latter. The use of the vaccine in this manner is a verfiable fact not an ‘unverifiable conspiracy theory’. Next you will be trying to convince me that antroprogenic global warming is real and based on sound science or that Operation Enduring Freedom was about bringing democracy to Iraq and that America has no history of using false flag events. No doubt you would assert that these are also ‘conspiracy theories’.</p>
<p>I know, I know. It all seems so ubelieveable and so much to take in but you have a choice to open your mind, question everything, to do your own research and thinking. Or you can just go back to sleep.</p>
<p>As an aside the fact that the method has been patented speaks volumes, the only reason to patent is to gain legal ownership and thus allow one to maximise profit. Worryingly patenting implies that this vaccine is due to be used in a widespread manner. Or maybe your explanation is that some company decided it didn’t need tens of thousands so it decided to spend it on patenting random stuff on the off chance that it ‘might’ be used at some stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bev Caron</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Bev Caron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-124</guid>
		<description>And that makes no sense at all Matt. How would preventing frequent deaths of children advance a cause of REDUCING population?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that makes no sense at all Matt. How would preventing frequent deaths of children advance a cause of REDUCING population?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cullen</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Mr. Jones, while your argument may seem logical on the surface it has some serious flaws. Lets start with your assertion that it was &#039;an obvious nod to the fact that population goes down as qualify of life goes up&#039;.  The single biggest determining factor for a reduction in population growth / birth rates in any country anywhere on the globe is education because as a general rule, when women become literate and educational attainment rates rise, birth rates fall.  That isn&#039;t just a vague socio-economic statement that&#039;s hard to grasp. That&#039;s a real predicator of actual behavior – your wife&#039;s and your daughter&#039;s. The higher an education a woman has, the fewer the children the woman will have. That&#039;s because women getting an education will put off getting married and having children until she&#039;s finished with her education. Educated women learn about contraception and family planning, so they have less unwanted pregnancies. Even further still, education broadens their perspectives about what the world has to offer them besides being a wife and mother. Which is why there are a number of cultures around the world consciously preventing or discouraging women from being educated. It isn&#039;t because they believe girls are incapable of learning. It&#039;s the reverse: they fear what the girls could accomplish if they were educated. Educated women also learn about how to better care for the children they already have, they spend more time, not less, with their kids not to mention they stimulate and engage the children in ways that would never even occur to those without an education. This poses the question as to why someone who is as well informed as Mr. Gates failed to mention this fact and instead chose to put forward &#039;health care&#039; and &#039;reproductive health services&#039; as being bigger drives for lowering birth rates. Not to mention that the assertion that new vaccines will lead to a reduction in population seems inconsistent with the whole purpose of using a vaccine which strangely enough is to prevent death. 

With regard to the WHO activities in the Philippines you fail to take into account the actual overwhelming historical evidence that it was indeed an intentional sterilisation device. Not to mention that the administraiton of the vaccine was carried out by a UN related body which has been shown time and time again to be a polictically corrupted institution. One would have to be either quite stupid, nieve or very well indoctrinated to believe that this was simply a case of a product with a &#039;serious flaw&#039;. The very fact that you have tried to muddy the waters by linking this to &#039;urban legends&#039; and &#039;unverifiable conspiracy theories&#039; leads me to believe that you are unfortunately the latter. The use of the vaccine in this manner is a verfiable fact not an &#039;unverifiable conspiracy theory&#039;. Next you will be trying to convince me that antroprogenic global warming is real and based on sound science or that Operation Enduring Freedom was about bringing democracy to Iraq and that America has no history of using false flag events. No doubt you would assert that these are also &#039;conspiracy theories&#039;.

I know, I know. It all seems so ubelieveable and so much to take in but you have a choice to open your mind, question everything, to do your own research and thinking. Or you can just go back to sleep.

As an aside the fact that the method has been patented speaks volumes, the only reason to patent is to gain legal ownership and thus allow one to maximise profit. Worryingly patenting implies that this vaccine is due to be used in a widespread manner. Or maybe your explanation is that some company decided it didn&#039;t need tens of thousands so it decided to spend it on patenting random stuff on the off chance that it &#039;might&#039; be used at some stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Jones, while your argument may seem logical on the surface it has some serious flaws. Lets start with your assertion that it was &#8216;an obvious nod to the fact that population goes down as qualify of life goes up&#8217;.  The single biggest determining factor for a reduction in population growth / birth rates in any country anywhere on the globe is education because as a general rule, when women become literate and educational attainment rates rise, birth rates fall.  That isn&#8217;t just a vague socio-economic statement that&#8217;s hard to grasp. That&#8217;s a real predicator of actual behavior – your wife&#8217;s and your daughter&#8217;s. The higher an education a woman has, the fewer the children the woman will have. That&#8217;s because women getting an education will put off getting married and having children until she&#8217;s finished with her education. Educated women learn about contraception and family planning, so they have less unwanted pregnancies. Even further still, education broadens their perspectives about what the world has to offer them besides being a wife and mother. Which is why there are a number of cultures around the world consciously preventing or discouraging women from being educated. It isn&#8217;t because they believe girls are incapable of learning. It&#8217;s the reverse: they fear what the girls could accomplish if they were educated. Educated women also learn about how to better care for the children they already have, they spend more time, not less, with their kids not to mention they stimulate and engage the children in ways that would never even occur to those without an education. This poses the question as to why someone who is as well informed as Mr. Gates failed to mention this fact and instead chose to put forward &#8216;health care&#8217; and &#8216;reproductive health services&#8217; as being bigger drives for lowering birth rates. Not to mention that the assertion that new vaccines will lead to a reduction in population seems inconsistent with the whole purpose of using a vaccine which strangely enough is to prevent death. </p>
<p>With regard to the WHO activities in the Philippines you fail to take into account the actual overwhelming historical evidence that it was indeed an intentional sterilisation device. Not to mention that the administraiton of the vaccine was carried out by a UN related body which has been shown time and time again to be a polictically corrupted institution. One would have to be either quite stupid, nieve or very well indoctrinated to believe that this was simply a case of a product with a &#8216;serious flaw&#8217;. The very fact that you have tried to muddy the waters by linking this to &#8216;urban legends&#8217; and &#8216;unverifiable conspiracy theories&#8217; leads me to believe that you are unfortunately the latter. The use of the vaccine in this manner is a verfiable fact not an &#8216;unverifiable conspiracy theory&#8217;. Next you will be trying to convince me that antroprogenic global warming is real and based on sound science or that Operation Enduring Freedom was about bringing democracy to Iraq and that America has no history of using false flag events. No doubt you would assert that these are also &#8216;conspiracy theories&#8217;.</p>
<p>I know, I know. It all seems so ubelieveable and so much to take in but you have a choice to open your mind, question everything, to do your own research and thinking. Or you can just go back to sleep.</p>
<p>As an aside the fact that the method has been patented speaks volumes, the only reason to patent is to gain legal ownership and thus allow one to maximise profit. Worryingly patenting implies that this vaccine is due to be used in a widespread manner. Or maybe your explanation is that some company decided it didn&#8217;t need tens of thousands so it decided to spend it on patenting random stuff on the off chance that it &#8216;might&#8217; be used at some stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gates: We can lower the world’s population with vaccines &#171; COTO Report</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gates: We can lower the world’s population with vaccines &#171; COTO Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-115</guid>
		<description>[...] Van&#8217;s Hardware Journal February 28, 2010 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Van&#8217;s Hardware Journal February 28, 2010 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt jones</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>matt jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-114</guid>
		<description>the quote reffered to the use of vaccines to prevent frequent deaths in childhood which spurn attempts to have children even more so, due to the ever looming chance of an early fatality. because vaccines can lower such prospects, and allow children to reach aduthood, rather than attempting to wardoff a lack or heis and family through increased reproduction, familes will be able to be better assureed that one or two children that they do have will be able to lead productive lives. further mmore the premise for the &#039;well documentede case&#039; provided has gaps in the reasoning of it as an intentional steralization device. it is far easier to steralize males than females through various means, which the article admits would have been easier to do given the lack of suspcion. furthermore women are less likely to be suspicius of vaccines, which accounted for the total lack of male vaccination patients in the country, they were not a target demographic. in addition, this seems at worst to be a product that had a serious flaw in it, given the lack of attention at hiding such a ploy. also the credibility of the article citing the time of the vaccination as the 1990&#039;s often as similiar reference patterns to urban legends and unrefiable conspiracy theories. it is irresponsiable to try and link a comnnection between an obvious nod to the fact that population naturally goes down as quality of life goes up, as an attempt to create a government conspiracy to forcibly steralize individuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the quote reffered to the use of vaccines to prevent frequent deaths in childhood which spurn attempts to have children even more so, due to the ever looming chance of an early fatality. because vaccines can lower such prospects, and allow children to reach aduthood, rather than attempting to wardoff a lack or heis and family through increased reproduction, familes will be able to be better assureed that one or two children that they do have will be able to lead productive lives. further mmore the premise for the &#8216;well documentede case&#8217; provided has gaps in the reasoning of it as an intentional steralization device. it is far easier to steralize males than females through various means, which the article admits would have been easier to do given the lack of suspcion. furthermore women are less likely to be suspicius of vaccines, which accounted for the total lack of male vaccination patients in the country, they were not a target demographic. in addition, this seems at worst to be a product that had a serious flaw in it, given the lack of attention at hiding such a ploy. also the credibility of the article citing the time of the vaccination as the 1990&#8242;s often as similiar reference patterns to urban legends and unrefiable conspiracy theories. it is irresponsiable to try and link a comnnection between an obvious nod to the fact that population naturally goes down as quality of life goes up, as an attempt to create a government conspiracy to forcibly steralize individuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharon kerley</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>sharon kerley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I can hardly believe I was studpid enough to think that Gates meant to have newer better vaccines to save lives..I also cannot imagine that information was mean&#039;t for the population at large.  My brain transposed it into thinking to save lives, I could not even berlieve  it otherwise until I read the print.  I listened to what he said probably 6  times.  no reason to trust anyone who is doing anything  with the government.  Herre we have people who do not even want contraaceptives available, as it is killing an embryo.  Come on get real, some of these people are the ones who think everyone should be shot up with vaccine.  sharon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can hardly believe I was studpid enough to think that Gates meant to have newer better vaccines to save lives..I also cannot imagine that information was mean&#8217;t for the population at large.  My brain transposed it into thinking to save lives, I could not even berlieve  it otherwise until I read the print.  I listened to what he said probably 6  times.  no reason to trust anyone who is doing anything  with the government.  Herre we have people who do not even want contraaceptives available, as it is killing an embryo.  Come on get real, some of these people are the ones who think everyone should be shot up with vaccine.  sharon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vanshardware.com/?p=342#comment-110</guid>
		<description>I wonder if gates or any of his associates have make any comments about his plans on how to use the vaccines and lower the number of the population by 2050.  He just mentioned it together with health care and something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if gates or any of his associates have make any comments about his plans on how to use the vaccines and lower the number of the population by 2050.  He just mentioned it together with health care and something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

